TrustRadius Insights
Ubiquiti Wireless WAN has been widely adopted by businesses due to its reliability and ease of management. Users have found it easy to …
Overview
What is Ubiquiti Wireless WAN?
Ubiquiti Networks offers wireless WAN.
Recent Reviews
Product Details
- About
- Tech Details
What is Ubiquiti Wireless WAN?
Ubiquiti Wireless WAN Technical Details
| Operating Systems | Unspecified |
|---|---|
| Mobile Application | No |
Comparisons
Compare with
Reviews and Ratings
(40)
Community Insights
TrustRadius Insights are summaries of user sentiment data from TrustRadius reviews and, when necessary, 3rd-party data sources. Have feedback on this content? Let us know!
- Business Problems Solved
- Pros
- Cons
Ubiquiti Wireless WAN has been widely adopted by businesses due to its reliability and ease of management. Users have found it easy to deploy, configure, and update, making it a popular choice as the primary WiFi solution in numerous sites. It offers differentiated SSIDs and isolated networks, catering to both administrative and industrial environments.
One of the major advantages of Ubiquiti is its cost-effectiveness; there are no annual licensing fees, making it more affordable compared to other solutions. Many clients have successfully deployed Ubiquiti access points, achieving extensive coverage even with a limited number of devices. For example, one client was able to cover a 65000 sq ft building using just 10 UniFi UAP-AC-HD access points.
Ubiquiti devices have proven their reliability beyond office settings. They have been used to establish reliable links between schools, demonstrating solid performance in various weather conditions. However, some users have reported occasional interference issues when using the AF-5 device, requiring continuous monitoring and adjustment due to the crowded 5GHz band.
Overall, Ubiquiti Wireless WAN offers stability and ease of management, making it suitable for various use cases such as site-to-site connectivity and advanced installations with high-reliability requirements. From offices to manufacturing facilities, Ubiquiti ensures reliable connectivity across different areas. Additionally, it also serves well for personal use, providing seamless transitions between wireless access points and PoE switches for enhanced security.
Quality and Durability: Users and reviewers have consistently praised the quality and durability of Ubiquiti devices, with multiple users noting their solid build and reliability. These devices are known for their long-lasting performance.
Extensive Features: The extensive features offered by Ubiquiti devices have been highlighted by numerous users, providing them with a wide range of options and functionalities to meet their specific needs. Users appreciate the versatility that these devices offer.
Ease of Configuration: Many users have mentioned the ease of configuration and installation of Ubiquiti devices, making them accessible to users of varying technical backgrounds. The simple setup process ensures a hassle-free experience for all users.
Limited Device Support Time: Some users have mentioned that they would like to see increased device support time in the latest Unifi controller versions. They have expressed a desire for longer periods of support to ensure their devices remain up-to-date and compatible with new features and improvements.
Confusing Control Panel for Novices: A few reviewers found the control panel of the product confusing, particularly for those who are new to networking. They suggested that improving the navigation and providing clearer instructions within the control panel would be beneficial for novice users to better understand and utilize its functionalities.
Lack of Phone Support: Several customers expressed frustration with the lack of phone support, as they can only rely on email or chat for assistance. They believe that having access to phone support would result in quicker issue resolution and a more personalized level of support.
Attribute Ratings
Reviews
(1-2 of 2)Companies can't remove reviews or game the system. Here's why
July 26, 2022
The Default First Choice for Best Value
There were different, highly varying instances of using Ubiquiti wireless products in my organization, for both internal and third-party use. We mainly use it for networking when we need site-to-site connectivity, as well as for simple wireless LAN when commercial home, SOHO, or prosumer solutions do not meet the more advanced and high-reliability requirements of the installation.
- Price to performance
- Ease of configuration
- Long term support
- Difficult to troubleshoot
- Challenging for extensibility
- Dim LEDs
- Limited retail availability in my region (Philippines)
- Ease of configuration
- Price to performance
- Long-term support
- Reduce network-related downtime for mission-critical operations.
- Relatively low CAPEX that is not bundled with a nasty subscription that adds to OpEx.
We have transitioned third-party partners and our own internal offices away from consumer, prosumer, or SOHO grade systems such as high-end ASUS, TP-Link, and even Xiaomi routers. For the same money, we can have a more properly architected network that has better performance, better access controls, and better security. We have evaluated other solutions from competitors, particularly Aruba Instant On. While admittedly Instant On is something I'd get for my home given the price, considering it's more geared towards SOHO or SMB than proper enterprise, I wouldn't recommend it for a professional install.
We currently have devices providing 4 links between schools. Two are using AF-24, one is using AF24-HD and one is using AF-5. One link using AF-24s is 1.5km (about a mile) and provides a solid link at 650-700Mbps through any weather. The AF-24HD is in a dual relay (4 devices) between schools in different towns. One link goes 8.5km (5.3miles) from a school to a water tower and the second goes 650m (about 2,000 feet) from the water tower to another school. This link has been solid at 700-750Mbps through any weather. The AF-5, which connects two schools 200m (650 feet) apart, has been having issues since it was installed. This link needs to be continually monitored and adjusted due to interference. The 5Ghz band is too crowded to be used in any area with close neighbors. Due to our wireless access points also using 5Ghz, as well as that of third-parties, almost all of the frequency is used. Moving our wireless access points off of a reserved range causes third-party wireless access points to prefer this reserved range. We are looking into replacing this with either a pair of AF-24 or AF-60 devices.
- Solid, reliable connections on higher freqencies
- Good view of current status of frequency congestion
- Fairly easy installation and alignment
- Congestion troubles on 5Ghz and 2.4Ghz
- Auto channel switching would help with the lower frequencies
- Cost efficient
- Easily managed
- Saved money by not running fiber optics
- Less experienced support personnel needed
When looking into Cisco options for WWAN, there were two issues we encountered. Up front as well as yearly maintenance costs for each device was considerably more expensive than the Ubiquiti options. And, although the Cisco options have more options to configure, it requires more knowledge to configure and maintain.